Georgian David Margoshvili decides to ura nage some frenchman who thinks that osoto gari sh!t works.
Friday, December 28, 2007
Monday, December 17, 2007
the Weight Room will be hosting a 'Strongman' training clinic on Saturday afternoons, from 2-4pm throughout January and February.
The intent is to teach beginners the core events of most strongman competitions, such as tire flipping, stone handling, the farmers walk, the log and press and so on.
please contact Chris Lawyer for more information:
Friday, December 14, 2007
I recently received an e-mail from a client that asked:
I hope this email finds you well and that your semester has come to a peaceful end. I do have one question, if I may trouble you for a moment.
Does strength training negate muscle building?
The premise of this question is that few reps with heavy weights tend to build strength and light weight with high reps build bigger muscles (pumps them full of blood and they tend to get larger but not necessarily stronger). If this is incorrect then the question is moot. But if someone does both types of weight lifting for similar muscle groups, does the strength training (heavy weights - low reps) negate the cosmetic features of muscle building?
A great Question. Are size and strength exclusive, can you train for one and the other at the same time, why are powerlifters so fat ? etc...
Great Question James!
Do you mind if I use this Q&A as an article on my new blog?
Basically, for the purpose of education and simplicity, experts in the field of Kinesiology have categorized various intensity ranges as leading to one type of adaptation or another. This happens both in strength training and in cardiovascular training. Just think of the 'fat burning zone' for instance. Truthfully, the muscle really only knows two things; tension and total work. And the adaptations that occur to increase these capacities are not mutually exclusive.
Tension is a result of the percentage of muscle fibers recruited. Total work is a physical and chemical phenomena; physical by definition, ie Force times distance=Work, and chemical in the nature by which that work is accomplished via the bodies various energy systems. Force production by the muscle, and hence adaptations to strength training happen as a result of the interplay of these two factors. How big is the muscle, and how efficiently does it run? A V-8 that runs at 50% is no faster than a 4 cylinder that is running at 100%.
Tension , or the ability to apply greater tension, is the primary adaptation that leads to gains in absolute strength. This adaptation occurs most greatly when loads are at a very high percentage of 1RM. For instance, if one can bench press 100lbs once, and no more, then 100lbs is your 1RM. To lift 60% or 60lbs, would be a trifle. To lift 95%, or 95lbs would only happen on a good day. Because of the requirement to maximally fire almost all motor units when lifting a load that is 95% 1RM, the synaptic paths to these motor units are primed in various mechanical and chemical ways, allowing them to fire more completely, faster, closer to the same time, or in rapid succession better than they used to before. This may happen by way of greater potentiation, myelination of the nerves, or chemical adaptations such as metabolic balances favoring lower thresholds or 'potentials' at various points along the way. All of these adaptations can be summed up as greater 'neurological' efficiency. It is by these methods that the muscle becomes more effective in producing force without increasing in size. Pavel calls it 'upgrading the muscle software' in Power to the People, I often refer to it as turbocharging the engine you have rather than upgrading to a bigger engine.
Work, the physical/mechanical aspect, bears some explanation. Work is a measurement of energy, as are calories. Let's get physical for a minute:
Force (measured in newtons, is anything that tends to cause acceleration, or a change in velocity) applied over a distance (linear or angular (that's where Torque comes in) measurement) is considered WORK. Work divided by time in physical terms is power. Calories are related to Joules. Joules/Time=Watts. Newton*meters/second=work. Well, as most of us remember from some sort of science class, energy is neither created nor destroyed. As such, in order for muscles to put out work, they have to put energy into the system.
Where this energy comes from, how much of it is needed, and how long it must be delivered to the muscles and out of the system are the primary variables in exercise selection and adaptation to them. All exercise is exo-thermic. Energy is given away, or put into the system or out of the body. The more reps done of something, the more the total work adds up. As a function of the longer time it takes, power output is often equal or less. The greater rate of power output times the greater length in time will equal greater and greater energy expenditure. It will also mean that the bodies choices for energy systems will start to shift. Here's some info about the body's energy systems for weightlifting type work;
ATP/CP: Quick and powerful fuel stored in the muscle. Under maximal power output may last 1-3 seconds, submaximal efforts can use CP for up to 30-60 seconds. It is depletion of these stores that encourages muscles to become larger, in an effort to store more mechanically.
Glycolosis: really gets going after 30-40 seconds, so really gains ground as ATP/CP taper off. Uses glucose, or sugar, in the muscle and blood to fuel work. Becomes insubstantial after about 100-150 seconds. Creates acid as a byproduct, lowering blood pH and eventually causing weakness, fatigue, nausea and an inability to continue producing force and or working out! When this energy system is taxed maximally, the organism becomes a better chemist. The buffers that stabilize pH and the cardiovascular components that shuffle chemicals around increase in capacity, thus delaying what is often referred to as the Lactate Threshold.
Aerobic: A long series of chemical reactions essentially leads to the use of oxygen to break down fat into energy. This takes 90 seconds or more to really get started, but can operate at submaximal levels for hours in some better trained endurance athletes. Faster delivery of oxygen, and an increased capacity to take it up are the primary adaptations to this stimulus.
The key is that if you were to graph these three sources, they would each look like a parabola. The x axis being time, and the y axis being energy contribution. Each overlaps the other, kind of like the Golden arches times three, such that at about 45 seconds, on average, the energy supply would look like this:
15% From ATP/CP
There is really a mix of energy sources supplying the energy required to perform the work. At any time between 10-100 seconds, this is always true. Hence, there is no weight, load, intensity or duration in typical strength training protocols that really isolates one source of chemical energy. And, there is no way to isolate one type of metabolic adaptation either.
Very long story not so short, there will always be some crossover. For example, if I choose to do 10 sets of 3 at 90% 1RM ( a classic powerlfiting protocol to increase absolute strength), I will experience a great deal of neuromuscular adaptations. I will become very efficient at that exercise, and strength will increase rapidly. Since the sets last an average of 15-20 seconds or so, I will use 90%+ ATP/CP, and I will reduce the available pool ENOUGH such that I will elicit some adaptation in the ability to store more. IE, my muscles will eventually get somewhat bigger. Even though traditionally, a S&C text will tell you that it is a strength training range, and not for hypertrophy. There are a great number of variables that could augment these results. Due to the time necessary to fully replenish CP stores between sets, this workout would lead to entirely different adaptations if it was perform with 90 seconds rest between sets versus 300 seconds.
The body is an amazing adaptive organism, and will take the path of least resistance. Ie, if you reach a high level of relative strength, it will be easier to become stronger by simply getting bigger. So, even if you utilize low-hypertrophy methods, the organism may see increases in mechanical size as an easier way to gain capacity than via greater neurological efficiency. It is like the Pareto Principal, or 80/20 rule. If greater force production is needed, and neurological efficiency is already at 95% and size is at 5%, it will be much easier to gain that force potential through size increases (which will require 20 to get 80) than it will be to make an already highly efficient mechanism even more efficient (spending 80 to get 20).
If you know what energy systems your are taxing most, and how completely you are taxing them, you have an excellent guide as to what adaptations to expect. If you wish to increase relative strength by way of greater absolute strength with no mass gains, you would be wise to avoid a great deal of total work, high volume and short rest periods. These will all encourage the muscles to get bigger. Especially at 60-85% of 1RM. Don't worry about the swings and kettlebell snatches. They are a little too light. Think of them as somewhere in the middle, using a 20-40% share from all three sources, providing an excellent method to use all forms of energy without gaining too much mass. In fact, a steady diet of KB Snatches and Swings is a sure fire way to burn fat and gain the work capacity of the T-100.
Good Luck in your training!
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Coming up on January 6th, 2008, Rick Hawn (currently ranked #1 in the USA at 90kg, formerly #1 at 81kgs) will be in Fredericksburg, VA. He will be teaching an all day seminar on competition judo techniques. One can only suspect that this would include a lot of unorthodox crossgripping and some seoi variations...
here's some vids!
This is Rick versus Tiago Camilo, usually considered one of the best in the world. He loses to Tiago's uchimata, but this was a VERY close call. Many would consider the throw only a yuko or waza ari.
Here's some footage from the 2006 and 2007 Senior Nationals;
one more seoi...
Thank you to the JUDOPODCAST for all the American footage.
( http://ca.youtube.com/thejudopodcast )
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Since moving to Richmond, I have been around a little. There are some great places to lift...
but so far my favorite, and the one where I spend the most time, has to be the Weight Room.
Run by Chris Lawyer, the Weight Room, off of Broad and Roseneath, near the intersection of 195/64, is not large. I think it's about 1600 square feet. It doesn't have a lot of fancy equipment. But it has two of the most important things a gym can have; people that can help you improve technically, and trainees that are serious about improving themselves. It sounds stupid, but the right environment is probably more important than any other single factor in serious lifting success. Since beginning training at the Weight Room, I have consistently hit new PR's in everything that I track. Much of this would have happened anywhere I train, but still. I know that much of was as great or as quick as it was due to the positive, supportive and intense environment that I have the luxury of training in a few times a week. Thanks TWR!
PS: Prices for membership vary, but I paid $150 for a six month membership. That's $25 a month, for a gym that has bumpers and tires and stones, amongst other things!
A few shots of me at the Weight Room, in Richmond, VA. Now that I am around 170lbs, all my lifts are going up! I can't wait to start training the Olympic Lifts more seriously, but I was pleasantly surprised to clean 195 (beating my old PR by 30+lbs) without much effort.
Here are some vids!
I was very happy with the new weight, and I totally thought that I was catching the bar lower and lower... but with a coach or a camera it becomes more clear that I am still catching high...
I'll keep working on it!
power to you, comrades!
So, what follows is me trying to figure out how all of this works... I'll be seeing if I can successfully post videos, pictures and other fun goodies!
Let's have a go, shall we?
So, what you are watching is the end of one of my kettlebell classes. The students you see in the video are Aaron B, a local BJJ blue belt, and James S, a professor. Aaron has obviously done sit throughs before, and is doing just fine cruising through to the end of this circuit. James has just learned them last week, and is finding it much harder to get to the end!
This is an excellent example of how it easy it is to mix Kettlebells with other protocols for sport specific conditioning, in this case, we hit windmills, then crunches, supermen and finally the travelling sit throughs to get some very mean metabolic conditioning for the core!